• McGlade, C. & Eakins, P. The geographic distribution of unused fossil fuels when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517187–190 (2015).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Welsby, D., Price, J., Pye, S. (2006). and Eakins, P. Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5°C world. Nature 597230–234 (2021).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Trout, K. et al. Current fossil fuel extraction will warm the world by more than 1.5°C. Environment. race. Late. 17064010 (2022).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Kuhne, K., Bartsch, N., Tate, RD, Higson, J. (2006). and Habet, A. “Carbon Bombs” – Mapping Major Fossil Fuel Projects. energy policy 166112950 (2022).

  • Global Coal to Clean Electricity Transition Statement (United Nations Climate Change Conference, 2021); https://ukcop26.org/global-coal-to-clean-power-transition-statement/

  • Hausfather, Z. & Moore, F. Net-zero commitments can limit warming to well below 2°C. net. Climb up Change 604247–248 (2022).

    How

    Google Scholar

  • Wright, C. & Nyberg, D. An Inconvenient Truth: How Organizations Turn Climate Change into Business as Usual. Acad. manage. J. 601633–1661 (2017).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Kuramochi, T. et al. Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climb up Policy 20275–291 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Rohleder, M., Wilkens, M., & Zink, J. (2010). The effect of mutual fund decarbonization on stock prices and carbon emissions. J. Bank. finance. 134106352 (2022).

  • Dietz, S., Gardiner, D., Jahn, V. & Noels, J. (2010). How ambitious are the climate targets of oil and gas companies? Science 374405–408 (2021).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Hadziosmanovic, M. et al. Using cumulative carbon budgeting and corporate carbon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long-term mitigation pathways. J. Industries. Ecol. 261747–1759 (2022).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Article 3, section 1 (United Nations, 1992); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

  • Pow, P., Mbewa, K. and van Asselt, H. The subtle differences of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement. Palgrave Commune. 586 (2019).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Reker, S., Ives, MC, Wade, B., Webb, L. (2006). and Gregg, C. Measuring Corporate Paris Compliance Using a Rigorous Science-Based Approach. net. General. 134441 (2022).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Crabbe, O. et al. Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals. net. Climb up Change 51057–1060 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Guidance on setting science-based targets for oil, gas and integrated energy companies (Science-based target, 2021); https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/legacy/2020/08/OG-Guidance.pdf

  • Reker, S., O’Brien, K., Humphrey, J. (2006). and Pascale, A. Comparing extraction rates of fossil fuel producers against global climate targets. net. Climb up Change 8489–492 (2018).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Heid, R. Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions 1854–2010 for fossil fuel and cement producers. Climb up Change 122229–241 (2014).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Full effect 2021: why oil and gas ‘net zero’ ambitions aren’t enough (Carbon Tracker, 2021); https://Carbontracker.org/reports/absolute-impact-2021/

  • How we beat Shell: Miliudéfense et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell plc – A glimpse behind the scenes (Environmental Defense, 2021).

  • Cox, R. and Reese, M. Defending the danger line: a manual for climate advocates: using legislation as a climate action tool to achieve the Paris temperature target (Posen Advocaten and Milieudefensie, 2022).

  • Heide, R. and Oreskes, N. Potential Emission of CO2 and methane from proven reserves of fossil fuels: an alternative analysis. Globe. Environment. Change 3612–20 (2016).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Statistical Review of World Energy 70th edition (BP, 2021); https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2021-full-report.pdf

  • Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. net. Climb up Change 4850–853 (2014).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Brack, D. & King, R. (2010). Management of land-based CDR: BECCS, forests and carbon sequestration. Globe. Policy 1245–56 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Lane, J., Gregg, C. & Garnett, A. (2010). Uncertain storage possibilities pose a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions. net. Climb up Change 11925–936 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Anderson, K. and Peters, G. Trouble with negative emissions. Science 354182–183 (2016).

  • Howard, C. et al. Why do we need the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty? Lancet Planet. Health 6e777–e778 (2022).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Rogelz, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global average temperature rise to well below 1.5°C. net. Climb up Change 8325–332 (2018).

    Article
    How

    Google Scholar

  • Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (International Energy Agency, 2021).

  • IPCC 1.5 Special Report on Global Warming°C (ed Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  • Tong, D. et al. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize the 1.5°C climate target. net. Climb up Change 572373–377 (2019).

    How

    Google Scholar

  • Pfeiffer, A., Hepburn, C., Vogt-Schlieb, A. (2010). and Caldecott, B. Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset strandings required to meet the Paris Agreement. Environment. Race. Late. 13054019 (2018).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Reker, S., Evaluating the alignment of fossil fuel companies along 1.5°C climate pathways. UQ Espace https://doi.org/10.48610/1357886 (2023).

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *